Difference between revisions of "Metabolic cages"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Metabolic cages create both welfare and scientific challenges and their use should be limited to procedures which are strictly necessary. [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058460 Kalliokoski ''et al.'' (2013)] concluded that mice do not habituate to metabolic cages. | Metabolic cages create both welfare and scientific challenges and their use should be limited to procedures which are strictly necessary. [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058460 Kalliokoski ''et al.'' (2013)] concluded that mice do not habituate to metabolic cages. | ||
| − | === Access to shelter in mouse metabolic cages === | + | ===Access to shelter in mouse metabolic cages=== |
====Introduction==== | ====Introduction==== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The time spent in the metabolic cages for urine collection is stressful for the animals. The animals are single housed with limited space, without a shelter on grid flooring and without bedding and environmental enrichment in the metabolic cage. Weight loss, lowering of the body temperature and ruffled fur coat can be seen in mice after metabolic caging. Prolonged stress is generally acknowledged to affect factors like kidney function and pharmacokinetics, so reducing stress in caged animals would likely result in more reliable research data. | The time spent in the metabolic cages for urine collection is stressful for the animals. The animals are single housed with limited space, without a shelter on grid flooring and without bedding and environmental enrichment in the metabolic cage. Weight loss, lowering of the body temperature and ruffled fur coat can be seen in mice after metabolic caging. Prolonged stress is generally acknowledged to affect factors like kidney function and pharmacokinetics, so reducing stress in caged animals would likely result in more reliable research data. | ||
| − | ==== '''Description of a mitigating initiative''' ==== | + | ===='''Description of a mitigating initiative'''==== |
In an attempt to reduce the stress, a small plastic igloo shelter was placed in the metabolic cages close to the water bottle. Mice can seek shelter in the igloo, thus reducing the stress and heat loss from single housing on grid floors. The rounded shape of the igloos prevents the mice from climbing the shelter and urine and faeces from accumulating on the roof. | In an attempt to reduce the stress, a small plastic igloo shelter was placed in the metabolic cages close to the water bottle. Mice can seek shelter in the igloo, thus reducing the stress and heat loss from single housing on grid floors. The rounded shape of the igloos prevents the mice from climbing the shelter and urine and faeces from accumulating on the roof. | ||
| − | ==== '''Results''' ==== | + | ===='''Results'''==== |
| − | When using DBA2 mice, the mice lost on average 4.3% of their body weight in the week after caging, without the shelter. In the study using shelters the average weight loss was 1.4%. | + | When using DBA2 mice, the mice lost on average 4.3% of their body weight in the week after caging, without the shelter. In the study using shelters the average weight loss was 1.4%. The DBA2 mice were weighed during the week before staying in the metabolic cage, and after staying in the metabolic cage for 24 hours. The access to shelter gives rise to a difference in weight loss, i.e. smaller weight loss with access to shelter. |
| + | |||
| + | ==== '''Conclusions''' ==== | ||
| + | The use of shelters reduced weight loss in DBA2 mice during metabolic caging. Different mouse strains react differently to stressors, and some are more prone to stress than others, due to this, different results from different strains of mice may arise. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The effect seen is likely due to reduced stress and reduced loss of body heat in mice allowed to seek shelter while single housed in metabolic cages. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use of the igloo did not compromise urine collection. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Even though we have not fully scientifically substantiated the benefit of shelters for all strains of mice, we still believe that the fact that the mice prefer to stay inside the igloos is reason enough for us to keep using them. | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 30 November 2020
Metabolic cages create both welfare and scientific challenges and their use should be limited to procedures which are strictly necessary. Kalliokoski et al. (2013) concluded that mice do not habituate to metabolic cages.
Contents
Access to shelter in mouse metabolic cages
Introduction
An elevated level of albumin in the urine is a result of leakage across the kidney barrier and the use of 24h urine collection to calculate albumin leakage into the urine is an established measurement of kidney injury in rodent models. The time spent in the metabolic cages for urine collection is stressful for the animals. The animals are single housed with limited space, without a shelter on grid flooring and without bedding and environmental enrichment in the metabolic cage. Weight loss, lowering of the body temperature and ruffled fur coat can be seen in mice after metabolic caging. Prolonged stress is generally acknowledged to affect factors like kidney function and pharmacokinetics, so reducing stress in caged animals would likely result in more reliable research data.
Description of a mitigating initiative
In an attempt to reduce the stress, a small plastic igloo shelter was placed in the metabolic cages close to the water bottle. Mice can seek shelter in the igloo, thus reducing the stress and heat loss from single housing on grid floors. The rounded shape of the igloos prevents the mice from climbing the shelter and urine and faeces from accumulating on the roof.
Results
When using DBA2 mice, the mice lost on average 4.3% of their body weight in the week after caging, without the shelter. In the study using shelters the average weight loss was 1.4%. The DBA2 mice were weighed during the week before staying in the metabolic cage, and after staying in the metabolic cage for 24 hours. The access to shelter gives rise to a difference in weight loss, i.e. smaller weight loss with access to shelter.
Conclusions
The use of shelters reduced weight loss in DBA2 mice during metabolic caging. Different mouse strains react differently to stressors, and some are more prone to stress than others, due to this, different results from different strains of mice may arise.
The effect seen is likely due to reduced stress and reduced loss of body heat in mice allowed to seek shelter while single housed in metabolic cages.
Use of the igloo did not compromise urine collection.
Even though we have not fully scientifically substantiated the benefit of shelters for all strains of mice, we still believe that the fact that the mice prefer to stay inside the igloos is reason enough for us to keep using them.
