Blood sampling of rainbow trout - Revision history

AS191219 at 06:55, 31 May 2022

2022-05-31T06:55:43Z

AS191219 at 18:50, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T18:50:24Z

Werenskjold at 22:14, 31 January 2021

2021-01-31T22:14:20Z

AS191219: Added links to websites

2020-10-24T09:45:04Z

Added links to websites

AS191219: Added link to pdf of poster

2020-10-24T09:41:10Z

Added link to pdf of poster

AS191219 at 09:39, 24 October 2020

2020-10-24T09:39:10Z

AS191219: Added poster image

2020-10-24T09:34:06Z

Added poster image

AS191219: Created page

2020-10-24T09:30:47Z

Created page

New page

The use of humane methods in animal research is an internationally recognized priority, but few Environmental Effects Monitoring programs use non-lethal methods with fish, and the ones that do are normally limited to behaviour, morphology and reproduction.

The goal of the study shown in this poster was to determine the impacts and survival of larger bodied fish after sampling small volumes of blood for the purpose of using non-lethal methods in Environment Effects Monitoring.

Overall, we observed 90% survival among all treatments; the most effective approach was the pressure-only (100% survival), while the post-treatment with the largest impact on fish survival was the use of betadine (75% survival).

We plan to repeat this test in the natural environment, and will post more information later.

<br />

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 This study has now been [https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/18470/non-lethal-animal-methods-in-environmental-toxicology published under Open Access]. The paper was part of a larger special topic on [https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/18470/non-lethal-animal-methods-in-environmental-toxicology non-lethal methods in environmental toxicology].
 We plan to repeat this test in the natural environment, and will post more information later.
 The poster may be [[:File:Anderson et al blood sampling rainbow trout.pdf|downloaded as a pdf file here]].<br />

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 4 May 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Overall, we observed 90% survival among all treatments; the most effective approach was the pressure-only (100% survival), while the post-treatment with the largest impact on fish survival was the use of betadine (75% survival).		Overall, we observed 90% survival among all treatments; the most effective approach was the pressure-only (100% survival), while the post-treatment with the largest impact on fish survival was the use of betadine (75% survival).
		+
		+	This study has now been [https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/18470/non-lethal-animal-methods-in-environmental-toxicology published under Open Access]. The paper was part of a larger special topic on [https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/18470/non-lethal-animal-methods-in-environmental-toxicology non-lethal methods in environmental toxicology].
		+

	We plan to repeat this test in the natural environment, and will post more information later.		We plan to repeat this test in the natural environment, and will post more information later.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 31 January 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Poster Title: '''''Non-lethal blood sampling from Rainbow trout in the laboratory and in situ'''''	+	Poster Title: '''''Non-lethal blood sampling from Rainbow trout in the laboratory and in situ'''''

	Co-authors: J. Anderson, S. Pollard, C.D. Tyson, J. Guchardi, D.B.D. Simmons		Co-authors: J. Anderson, S. Pollard, C.D. Tyson, J. Guchardi, D.B.D. Simmons

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 24 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Poster Title: '''''Non-lethal blood sampling from Rainbow trout in the laboratory and in situ'''''
		+
		+	Co-authors: J. Anderson, S. Pollard, C.D. Tyson, J. Guchardi, D.B.D. Simmons
		+
		+	[http://www.aquaticomics.com Aquatic Omics Lab], [https://ontariotechu.ca Ontario Tech University], Oshawa, ON, Canada
		+
	The use of humane methods in animal research is an internationally recognized priority, but few Environmental Effects Monitoring programs use non-lethal methods with fish, and the ones that do are normally limited to behaviour, morphology and reproduction.		The use of humane methods in animal research is an internationally recognized priority, but few Environmental Effects Monitoring programs use non-lethal methods with fish, and the ones that do are normally limited to behaviour, morphology and reproduction.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 24 October 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:


−	The poster may be downloaded as a pdf file here.<br />	+	The poster may be [[:File:Anderson et al blood sampling rainbow trout.pdf\|downloaded as a pdf file here]].<br />

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 24 October 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:


−	<br />	+	The poster may be downloaded as a pdf file here.<br />

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 24 October 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:

	We plan to repeat this test in the natural environment, and will post more information later.		We plan to repeat this test in the natural environment, and will post more information later.
		+	[[File:Anderson et al Non lethal blood sampling rainbow trout poster.jpg\|center\|thumb]]
		+

	<br />		<br />